• Log In

RERC on AAC

  • Home
  • People
  • News
    • Future of AAC Research Summit – 2024
    • News
    • Presentations
    • Publications
    • Archives (2014-2020)
      • R1: Brain-computer interface
      • R2: Supporting transition to literacy
      • R3: Visual cognitive processing demands
      • D1: Multimodal technologies
      • D2: Interactive video visual scene displays
      • D3: Smart Predictor app
      • D4: Cognitive demands checklist
  • Research
    • R1: Video Visual Scene Display (VSD) Intervention
    • R2: AAC Literacy Decoding Technology
      • Design of the transition to literacy (T2L) decoding feature
    • R3: Motion to improve AAC user interface displays
    • Consumer & Technology Forums
      • Communication with Direct Support Professionals: The Experiences of AAC Users (2024)
      • The participation of people who rely on AAC in the pre-service preparation of communication, education, and medical professionals (2023)
      • The patient-provider experiences of people with CP who use AAC (2022)
  • Development
    • D1: Access Assistant Software to Improve Alternative Access Services
    • D2: Smart Select: a new switch access method
    • D3: mTraining in AAC for Communication Partners
  • Training
    • T1: Mentored Research and Lab Experiences
    • T2: Rehabilitation Engineering Student Capstone Projects
    • T3: Student Research and Design Challenges
    • T4: Doctoral Student AAC Research Think Tank
    • T5: Webcasts & Instructional Modules
  • eBlast & Dissemination
    • eBlast
    • Free ePrints
    • Presentations
    • Publications
  • Webcasts & Instructional Modules

Design of the transition to literacy (T2L) decoding feature

Currently, literacy outcomes for the more than 3.5 million individuals with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs are very poor; more than 90% do not have functional literacy skills. A major barrier to literacy learning is the design of current AAC technologies. Individuals with complex communication needs who are nonliterate use AAC systems with pictures or photos; these systems do not support literacy learning. The research suggests that users do not attend to the small, static, text labels that are typically provided above picture symbols; indeed, the symbols may actually block processing of the written words. Stakeholders have consistently highlighted the urgent need for the development of new AAC technologies that support the acquisition of literacy skills (specifically decoding, that is, the use of letter sound knowledge and sound blending to read words). Such technology has broad application for children and adults with a wide range of developmental disabilities who are not literate.

Developing literacy skills is a complex process that rests on the fluent integration of knowledge and skills across a wide range of domains, including, for example, language skills, background knowledge, phonological awareness skills, letter sound correspondences, decoding, and sight word recognition.

Learning to decode is facilitated by the integration of:

• orthographic processing (i.e., knowledge of letters and letter patterns);
• phonological processing (i.e., identification, manipulation, and memory of the sound structure of speech);
• meaning processing (i.e., knowledge of words and their meanings); and
• contextual processing (i.e., use of background knowledge to derive meaning from text) (e.g., Adams, 1994).

We propose the development of grid-based and visual scene display (VSD) apps with transition to literacy (T2L) features to support the acquisition of decoding skills. The desired features for this app include the following:

demonstration of T2L feature

(a) dynamic smooth movement of text (upon selection of a graphic symbol from the AAC display), using motion to draw visual attention to the text (cf. Jagaroo & Wilkinson, 2008) to support orthographic processing;

(b) pairing of the written word with speech output to support phonological processing;

(c) use of luminance (i.e., brightness contrast) to attract visual attention to the individual letters within the context of the entire word;

(d) pairing of each highlighted letter with the letter sound to support phonological processing;

(e) origination of the text from the graphic symbol to support the association of the symbol and the text and thereby support understanding of the meaning of the text;

(f) replacement of the graphic symbol by the text to make the word salient and eliminate distraction;

(g) targeting words for the symbols within the learner’s AAC system to ensure that concepts are known thus supporting the association of meaning with the text.

The broad context provided by the AAC display and the communication situation may also support learning. The exposure to text is infused into the individual’s AAC system, thus ensuring that literacy learning is driven by the individual’s interests and needs (Light & McNaughton, 2009).

References

Adams, M. J. (1994). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT press.

Jagaroo, V., & Wilkinson, K. (2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 29-42.

Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2009). Addressing the literacy demands of the curriculum for conventional and more advanced readers and writers who require AAC. In Zangari, C., & Soto, G. (Eds) Practically speaking: Language, literacy, and academic development for students with AAC needs, 217-246. Brookes Publishing.

Cite as: Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Jakobs, E. (2019). Design of transition to literacy (T2L) decoding feature. RERC on AAC: Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Retrieved from https://rerc-aac.psu.edu/design-of-t2l-decoding-feature/

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive the eBlast  four times per year

Recent Posts

  • The first word in accessibility is “access” (Regan, 2025)
  • Alternative ways to access AAC technologies (Ramirez, 2025)
  • Future of AAC technologies: priorities for inclusive innovation (Williams & Holyfield, 2025)
  • Nothing about AAC users without AAC users: a call for meaningful inclusion in research, technology development, and professional training (Blasko et al., 2025)
  • To include us in our own worlds: AAC is not optional (Koloni, 2025)

Recent Publications and Presentation

Patrick Regan and a quote from his article in the AAC journal

The first word in accessibility is “access” (Regan, 2025)

Patrick Regan (2025) is President-Elect of USSAAC, and he also plays leadership roles in ISAAC, and in outreach programs for the Bridge School. Patrick experiences Spinal Muscular Atrophy, and has used a wide variety of AAC to communicate. In this paper, he describes “access challenges that I have experienced as someone who uses AAC, how my team and I have resolved them, and what challenges I face now.”

Now free at the AAC journal
https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2025.2513912

Other recent activity

Conferences

Recent

ASHA (2024) handouts and virtual posters

ATIA (2025) handouts

Upcoming

ASHA 2025

 

 

Follow the RERC on Facebook!

Follow the RERC on Facebook!

Copyright © 2025 · Enterprise Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

The contents of this website were developed under a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number 90REGE0014) to the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication (RERC on AAC). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, or HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.