• Log In

RERC on AAC

  • Home
  • People
  • News
    • Future of AAC Research Summit – 2024
    • News
    • Presentations
    • Publications
    • Archives (2014-2020)
      • R1: Brain-computer interface
      • R2: Supporting transition to literacy
      • R3: Visual cognitive processing demands
      • D1: Multimodal technologies
      • D2: Interactive video visual scene displays
      • D3: Smart Predictor app
      • D4: Cognitive demands checklist
  • Research
    • R1: Video Visual Scene Display (VSD) Intervention
    • R2: AAC Literacy Decoding Technology
      • Design of the transition to literacy (T2L) decoding feature
    • R3: Motion to improve AAC user interface displays
    • Consumer & Technology Forums
      • Communication with Direct Support Professionals: The Experiences of AAC Users (2024)
      • The participation of people who rely on AAC in the pre-service preparation of communication, education, and medical professionals (2023)
      • The patient-provider experiences of people with CP who use AAC (2022)
  • Development
    • D1: Access Assistant Software to Improve Alternative Access Services
    • D2: Smart Select: a new switch access method
    • D3: mTraining in AAC for Communication Partners
  • Training
    • T1: Mentored Research and Lab Experiences
    • T2: Rehabilitation Engineering Student Capstone Projects
    • T3: Student Research and Design Challenges
    • T4: Doctoral Student AAC Research Think Tank
    • T5: Webcasts & Instructional Modules
  • eBlast & Dissemination
    • eBlast
    • Free ePrints
    • Presentations
    • Publications
  • Webcasts & Instructional Modules

Operational demands of AAC mobile technology (Caron et al., 2016)

January 15, 2016 by David McNaughton

VSD Programming examplesCaron, J., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2016). Operational demands of AAC mobile technology applications on programming vocabulary and engagement during professional and child interactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 12-24.
DOI:10.3109/07434618.2015.1126636
Available through NARIC Request

Abstract: Typically, the vocabulary in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) technologies is pre-programmed by manufacturers or by parents and professionals outside of daily interactions. Because vocabulary needs are difficult to predict, young children who use aided AAC often do not have access to vocabulary concepts as the need and interest arises in their daily interactions, limiting their vocabulary acquisition and use. Ideally, parents and professionals would be able to add vocabulary to AAC technologies “just-in-time” as required during daily interactions. This study compared the effects of two AAC applications for mobile technologies: GoTalk Now (which required more programming steps) and EasyVSD (which required fewer programming steps) on the number of visual scene displays (VSDs) and hotspots created in 10-min interactions between eight professionals and preschool-aged children with typical development. The results indicated that, although all of the professionals were able to create VSDs and add vocabulary during interactions with the children, they created more VSDs and hotspots with the app with fewer programming steps than with the one with more steps, and child engagement and programming participation levels were high with both apps, but higher levels for both variables were observed with the app with fewer programming steps than with the one with more steps. These results suggest that apps with fewer programming steps may reduce operational demands and better support professionals to (a) respond to the child’s input, (b) use just-in-time programming during interactions, (c) provide access to more vocabulary, and (d) increase participation.

Filed Under: News, Publication, Research

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive the eBlast  four times per year

Recent Posts

  • The first word in accessibility is “access” (Regan, 2025)
  • Alternative ways to access AAC technologies (Ramirez, 2025)
  • Future of AAC technologies: priorities for inclusive innovation (Williams & Holyfield, 2025)
  • Nothing about AAC users without AAC users: a call for meaningful inclusion in research, technology development, and professional training (Blasko et al., 2025)
  • To include us in our own worlds: AAC is not optional (Koloni, 2025)

Recent Publications and Presentation

Patrick Regan and a quote from his article in the AAC journal

The first word in accessibility is “access” (Regan, 2025)

Patrick Regan (2025) is President-Elect of USSAAC, and he also plays leadership roles in ISAAC, and in outreach programs for the Bridge School. Patrick experiences Spinal Muscular Atrophy, and has used a wide variety of AAC to communicate. In this paper, he describes “access challenges that I have experienced as someone who uses AAC, how my team and I have resolved them, and what challenges I face now.”

Now free at the AAC journal
https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2025.2513912

Other recent activity

Conferences

Recent

ASHA (2024) handouts and virtual posters

ATIA (2025) handouts

Upcoming

ASHA 2025

 

 

Follow the RERC on Facebook!

Follow the RERC on Facebook!

Copyright © 2026 · Enterprise Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

The contents of this website were developed under a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number 90REGE0014) to the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication (RERC on AAC). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, or HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.